are your agents validating acceptance criteria or hopes and dreams?

You tried this before, and it failed for a reason.

Specs nobody could implement. Agents that improvised around ambiguous requirements. No traceability from requirement to shipped code, so the postmortem had nothing to inspect.

That failure had a cause, and it was never a lack of enthusiasm.

The gap between a demo and a deliverable is traceability.

A demo impresses in the meeting; a deliverable can be audited after the fact. If your current stack cannot walk a reviewer from requirement to shipped code, the next attempt fails the same way.

Auditability

Acceptance criteria are validated against evidence, not vibes. The orchestrator is open to inspection.

Inspect the orchestrator

Inspectability

The memory white paper is published and open; the agentic.ai score (21/36, September 2026) is third-party evaluated.

Memory white paper agentic.ai score (evaluated September 2026)

Observability

You can see what your agents did and why. Published documentation demonstrates the practice.

Engineering notes Benchmarks

Cost transparency

How much did it cost? Answered with real numbers, per agent, per run.

$6.96 total for one complete agent run

one point-in-time security sweep: 24 remediation tasks filed and completed by agents; per-task costs $0.09 to $1.50, average $0.29; September 2026

Source: driftless platform usage data, September 2026

Walk through your use case against your stack, leave with a concrete rollout sketch.

Talk to sales Sign up now

Company *

Name *

Email *

Anything else we should know?

You tried this before, and it failed for a reason.

The gap between a demo and a deliverable is traceability.

Pricing