// Get info
More from the AI stack you already pay for
I don’t want to add to my AI spend.
The bill grows before the value does.
Models, coding agents, and tooling: the stack is already paid for and already configured. What keeps growing is everything around it: rework, coordination, and prompts nobody can trace to a requirement.
What you want is the same stack doing more, with the cost of every driftless-coordinated task visible: the spend that goes through the system, instead of discovered on the invoice.
- Additive: your providers, agents, and setup stay as they are
- No migration; your stack stays as configured
- No credit card required
- You leave the walk-through with a concrete rollout sketch
Coordination is the line item nobody can see.
The spend that gets blamed is the model bill, but the bigger cost hides in the loop: under-specified requests, rework when results miss, and coordination time between people, prompts, and tools.
None of it shows up as a line item, so the budget conversation stays guesswork.
Requests go straight to the models.
Without a gate, under-specified work reaches the models and burns tokens before anyone defines done. Without a ledger for driftless-coordinated work, that spend surfaces only as a larger bill, with no attribution to a task, an agent, or an outcome.
The gate spends less; the ledger shows where it goes.
Under-specified work stops at the gate before tokens burn. Every driftless-coordinated task carries its own cost in the ledger, the spend that goes through the system. And the models and agents you already configured keep doing the work, with less rework and coordination overhead.
The controlled delivery path
Do we know what should be built?
A shaped requirement: intent, constraints, and acceptance criteria, written before agents start.
Is it clear, complete, buildable?
The gate holds the requirement until every criterion is objective and buildable.
Can agents execute it coherently?
Agents build against the spec; every change stays traceable to the requirement.
Did the result meet every criterion?
Criterion-by-criterion evidence validates the result before it ships.
One story, end to end: the September security sweep
This sweep is the cost story: 24 driftless-coordinated tasks with per-task costs visible in the ledger, the spend that goes through the system, and a verified total at the end from one real September run.
A requirement entered, the gate held it, agents executed it, and every task carried completion evidence before the result shipped.
Sweep the open CVE alerts, shaped into a point-in-time security sweep with grouped, per-cluster filing.
The gate held the requirement until the sweep scope and filing rules were objective.
Agents executed the sweep and filed remediation tasks per cluster.
Every task carried completion evidence; the verified result shipped with per-task costs visible.
one point-in-time security sweep: 24 remediation tasks filed and completed by agents; per-task costs $0.09 to $1.50, average $0.29; September 2026
Outcome: 24 vulnerabilities remediated; 24 of 24 remediation tasks completed. Source: driftless platform usage data, September 2026
Single point-in-time sweep; excludes remediation work beyond the 24 filed tasks. Duration and human-involvement figures are not verified and are not shown.
The gate blocks under-specified work before tokens burn, and the per-task, per-run cost ledger shows where coordinated spend concentrates.
one point-in-time security sweep: 24 remediation tasks filed and completed by agents; per-task costs $0.09 to $1.50, average $0.29; September 2026
Outcome: 24 vulnerabilities remediated; 24 of 24 remediation tasks completed.. Period: September 2026. Source: driftless platform usage data, September 2026
The savings claim stays directional (rework, coordination) until verified from live data: no savings percentage, multiplier, or dollar figure. Spend outside driftless’s purview is not visible.
The cost ledger for driftless-coordinated work: where spend concentrates, visible before the invoice.
one point-in-time security sweep: 24 remediation tasks filed and completed by agents; per-task costs $0.09 to $1.50, average $0.29; September 2026
Outcome: undefined. Period: September 2026. Source: driftless platform usage data, September 2026
Spend outside driftless’s purview is not visible and is never implied to be.
Acceptance criteria validated against evidence artifacts on shipped agent work.
Inspect the orchestratorDo we have to replace the models or agents we already pay for?
No. driftless adds the control layer to the stack you already configured; your providers, agents, and tools stay exactly as they are.
Does the visibility cover our whole AI bill?
No, and the copy never implies it. The ledger covers driftless-coordinated work: the spend that goes through the system.
Will this actually lower the bill?
Directionally: the gate blocks under-specified work before tokens burn, and rework and coordination costs drop. No savings figure ships until it is verified from live data.
The offer
- Bring
- your use case and the stack it runs on
- Receive
- a walk-through of that use case against your stack, leaving with a concrete rollout sketch
- Duration
- the walk-through call
- Commitment
- contact details only; nothing migrates and your providers, agents, and setup stay as they are
- Afterward
- you leave with a concrete rollout sketch for your stack
- Additive: your providers, agents, and setup stay as they are
- No migration; your stack stays as configured
- No credit card required
- You leave the walk-through with a concrete rollout sketch
Bring one recent agent workflow; the notes field is the place to start.
Something went wrong. Please try again or email us at sales@godriftless.ai.
Pricing
Priced per seat, after the evidence. The ledger covers the spend that goes through the system.
$100 per seat / month for your first 100 seats, then $70 per seat. Free tier to start.